Volume 4, Issue 3 (Autumn 2001)                   J Arak Uni Med Sci 2001, 4(3): 23-31 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Davami M H, Moiini L, Rafiei M. Evaluation of Principles Considerations in the B Dissertations of Medical Students Submitted at Arak University of Medical Sciences 1373 (1994) to 1379 (2000). J Arak Uni Med Sci 2001; 4 (3) :23-31
URL: http://jams.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-6733-en.html
1- Faculty of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Abstract:   (963 Views)
Introduction: Persuading  research  activities  is  the  major  factor  for  scientific  and  technological  progress  in  the  societies. The  role  of  universities  is  essential  and  a  properly  prepared  scientific  dissertation  is  an  important  factor  for  this  purpose. This  study  was  carried  out  to  evaluate  the  major  writing  principles  in  dissertations  of  medical  students  at  Arak  University  of  Medical  Sciences.
Material  and  Method: 266  dissertations  of  medical  students  graduated   from  1373  to  1379  from  Arak  University  of  Medical  Sciences  were  studied.  In  each  writing  prepared  questionbaires  were  filled  out  by  academic  staffs  based  on  Lickert  Format.  The  data  were  analyzed  by  descriptive  statistical  Methods.
Results: The  highest  frequency  of  dissertations  were  related  to  graduate  students  graduated  in  1375 (23%). The  highest  frequency  in  academic  departments  was  Department  of  Internal  Medicine  (17.7%)  and  Department  of  Ophthalmology (13.2%). Ladies  were  more  interested  in  department  of  Dermatology  and  Gynocology  and  men  were  more  interested  in  Department  of  Surgery  and  Internal  Medicine.  Considering  the  kind  of  dissertations, the  most  frequency  was  recorded  for  observational-cross-sectional  studies (44%).  No  translation  review  article  dissertation  was  recorded. 52%  of  dissertations  were  evaluated  as  Good, 40%  of  them  were  Fair  and 8%  were  evaluated  as  unacceptable.  Considering  the  different  parts  of  a  dissertation. "The Abstract"(%54%) and  "The  Results" (52%) were evaluated  as  the  best  and  The  Discussion  (26.7%)  was  evaluated  as  the  worst.
Conclusion: Although  the  quality  of  scientific  writing  of  research  dissertations  of  medical  students  has  improved  over  the  past  few  years, but  preparation  of  a  standard  and  consistent  framework  by  research  deputy  of  Health  Ministry  looks  necessary  for  scientific  dissertations.
Full-Text [PDF 390 kb]   (225 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Atricle | Subject: psychology
Received: 2021/01/24 | Accepted: 2001/10/2

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Arak University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb