Volume 29, Issue 2 (5-2026)
J Arak Uni Med Sci 2026, 29(2): 83-90 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Amani F, Pouyamanesh J, Amiri Majd M, Alijani F. Predicting Emotional Divorce in Women Based on Communication Patterns and Self-Criticism with the Mediating Role of Sexual Function. J Arak Uni Med Sci 2026; 29 (2) :83-90
URL: http://jams.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-7986-en.html
URL: http://jams.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-7986-en.html
1- Department of Counseling, Ab.C., Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran , f.amani1980s@gmail.com
2- Department of Psychology, Ab.C., Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran
2- Department of Psychology, Ab.C., Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran
Abstract: (511 Views)
Introduction: Emotional divorce is a type of dysfunction in the family system that, while not leading to the physical separation of couples, results in a marital life lacking love, companionship, and friendship, with negative consequences for family functioning. This study aimed to predict emotional divorce based on communication patterns and self-criticism, with sexual functioning as a mediating factor.
Methods: This study was applied in purpose and correlational in nature, utilizing a path analysis design. The statistical population consisted of all married women visiting counseling centers in Tehran in 2023. From this population, 300 women were selected through random cluster sampling. Data collection tools included Gottman’s Emotional Divorce Scale (1999), Heavey et al.’s Communication Patterns Questionnaire (1996), Rosen et al.’s Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (2000), and Thompson and Zuroff’s Self-Criticism Scale (2004). The data were analyzed using path analysis.
Results: The results indicated that the direct effect of mutual constructive and avoidant communication patterns on sexual functioning was significant (p < 0.05), but the direct effect of the demand/withdraw communication pattern on sexual functioning was not significant (P > 0.05). The direct effect of self-criticism on sexual functioning was significant (P < 0.05). The direct effect of avoidant and demand/withdraw communication patterns on emotional divorce was significant (P < 0.05), but the direct effects of self-criticism and sexual functioning on emotional divorce were not significant (P > 0.05). The mutual constructive communication pattern had no significant effect on emotional divorce (P > 0.05). Additionally, the results showed that sexual functioning mediated the relationship between demand/withdraw and avoidant communication patterns and emotional divorce (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: These findings highlight the interplay between communication styles, self-criticism, and emotional divorce, emphasizing the importance of addressing these factors in therapeutic settings.
Methods: This study was applied in purpose and correlational in nature, utilizing a path analysis design. The statistical population consisted of all married women visiting counseling centers in Tehran in 2023. From this population, 300 women were selected through random cluster sampling. Data collection tools included Gottman’s Emotional Divorce Scale (1999), Heavey et al.’s Communication Patterns Questionnaire (1996), Rosen et al.’s Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (2000), and Thompson and Zuroff’s Self-Criticism Scale (2004). The data were analyzed using path analysis.
Results: The results indicated that the direct effect of mutual constructive and avoidant communication patterns on sexual functioning was significant (p < 0.05), but the direct effect of the demand/withdraw communication pattern on sexual functioning was not significant (P > 0.05). The direct effect of self-criticism on sexual functioning was significant (P < 0.05). The direct effect of avoidant and demand/withdraw communication patterns on emotional divorce was significant (P < 0.05), but the direct effects of self-criticism and sexual functioning on emotional divorce were not significant (P > 0.05). The mutual constructive communication pattern had no significant effect on emotional divorce (P > 0.05). Additionally, the results showed that sexual functioning mediated the relationship between demand/withdraw and avoidant communication patterns and emotional divorce (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: These findings highlight the interplay between communication styles, self-criticism, and emotional divorce, emphasizing the importance of addressing these factors in therapeutic settings.
References
1. Sanctuary G. Marriage under stress: a comparative study of marriage conciliation. New York: Routledge; 2023.
2. Pincus L. Marriage: Studies in emotional conflict and growth. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2023.
3. Parkinson L. Conciliation in separation and divorce: Finding common ground. New York: Routledge; 2023.
4. Al-Shahrani HF, Hammad MA. Relationship between emotional divorce and alexithymia among married women in Saudi Arabia. BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):217. pmid: 37533120 doi:10.1186/s40359-023-01236-w
5. Damo DD, Cenci CMB. Emotional divorce: similarities and differences according to the position occupied. Trends in Psychology. 2021;29(3):505-18. doi:10.1007/s43076-021-00088-w
6. McKie C. Divorce, an overview. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. 2024:1859-61. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_768
7. Dargahi S, Ayadi N, Khabazi M. Causal Relationships of Differentiation, Latent Communicative Aggression, and Emotional Divorce in Conflicting Women with the Mediating Role of Marital Conflict [in Persian]. Iranian Journal of Family Psychology. 2024;11(1):48-61. doi: 10.22034/ijfp.2024.2028681.1317
8. Halim S, Jaffar MN, Yanti ER. The communication patterns of husband and wife couples in resolving household conflicts: Islamic family law perspectives. KARSA Journal of Social and Islamic Culture. 2024;32(1):33-71. doi:10.19105/karsa.v32i1.13280
9. Fearn M, Marino C, Spada MM, Kolubinski DC. Self-critical rumination and associated metacognitions as mediators of the relationship between perfectionism and self-esteem. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther. 2022;40(1):155-74. pmid: 34177104 doi:10.1007/s10942-021-00404-4
10. Peixoto MM, Lopes J. Sexual functioning beliefs, sexual satisfaction, and sexual functioning in women: a cross-sectional mediation analysis. J Sex Med. Medicine. 2023;20(2):170-6.
11. Beltran-Arreche M, Fullana Noell J, Pallisera Díaz M. Perspectives of women with intellectual disabilities regarding affective sexual relationships: A systematic literature review. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2024;21(1):263-78. doi:10.1007/s13178-023-00911-2
12. Girma Shifaw Z. Marital communication as moderators of the relationship between marital conflict resolution and marital satisfaction. Am J Fam Ther. 2024;52(3):249-60. doi:10.1080/01926187.2022.2089404
13. Galati MCR, Hollist CS, do Egito JHT, Osório AAC, Parra GR, Neu C, et al. Sexual dysfunction, depression, and marital dissatisfaction among Brazilian couples. J Sex Med. 2023;20(3):260-8. pmid: 36763940 doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdac004
14. Daneshfar F, Keramat A. Sexual dysfunction and divorce in Iran: A systematic review. J Family Med Prim Care. 2023;12(3):430-9. pmid: 37122645 doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_991_22
15. Khosravi F, Jamali J, Didehban E, Norouzi Z. The Moderating Effect of Gender Role in Relationship Between Emotional Divorce and Marital Satisfaction: Comparison of Partial Least Square (PLS) and Consistent Partial Least Square Methods (PlSc) Methods. J Family Reprod Health. 2024;18(3):188. pmid: 39439732 doi:10.18502/jfrh.v18i3.16661
16. Mohammadi Kh, Heydari M, Faghihzadeh S. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): validation of the Iranian version [in Persian]. Payesh. 2008;7(3):269-78.
17. Mousavi Khorami Z, Dokanehi Fard F, Khakpour R. Model of Emotional Divorce Based on the Components of Early Maladaptive Schemas and Attachment Styles with Emotional Intelligence Mediation [in Persian]. Islamic Lifestyle with a Focus on Health. 2020;4(3):63-74.
18. Pourhossein R, Bidest F. Validity test of the emotional divorce test [in Persian]. Rooyesh. 2014;8:27-38.
19. Heavey CL, Larson BM, Zumtobel DC, Christensen A. The Communication Patterns Questionnaire: The reliability and validity of a constructive communication subscale. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1996;85(3):796-800. doi:10.2307/353737
20. Christensen A, Heavey CL. Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;59(1):73-81. pmid: 2213491 doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.1.73
21. Asadi M, Nazari AM, Sanai B. The Effectiveness of Satir Brief Family Therapy On The Couple Communication Patterns [in Persian]. Journal Title. 2009;3(1):65-76.
22. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, e al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191-208. pmid: 10782451 doi: 10.1080/009262300278597.
23. Thompson R, Zuroff DC. The Levels of Self-Criticism Scale: Comparative self-criticism and internalized self-criticism. Pers Individ Dif. 2004;36(2):419-30. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00106-5
24. Shariati M, Hamid N, Hashemi ShaykhShabani E, Beshlideh K, Marashi A. The effectiveness of compassion focused therapy on depression and self criticism of female university students [in Persian]. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2016;17(1):43-50.
25. . Yamaguchi A, Kim M-S. Effects of self-criticism and its relationship with depression across cultures. International Journal of Psychological Studies. 2013;5(1):1. doi:10.5539/ijps.v5n1p1
26. Mousavi AS, Ghorbani N. Self-knowledge, self-criticism and mental health [in Persian]. Psychological Studies. 2006;2(3-4):75-91.
27. Henseler J, Sarstedt M. Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Comput Stat. 2013;28:565-80. doi:10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1
28. . Mam Salehi H, Moradi O, Arefi M, Yar Ahmadi Y. The relationship between sex schemas and sexual satisfaction of couples: the mediating role of communication patterns. Journal of Health and Care. 2019;21(3):242-51. doi:10.29252/jhc.21.3.242
29. Litzinger S, Gordon KC. Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005;31(5):409-24. pmid: 16169824 doi:10.1080/00926230591006719
30. Robins:on-Keilig RA. Secondary traumatic stress and disruptions to interpersonal functioning among mental health therapists. J Interpers Violence. 2014;29(8):1477-96. pmid: 24288190 doi:10.1177/0886260513507135
31. Lassri D, Luyten P, Fonagy P, Shahar G. Undetected scars? Self-criticism, attachment, and romantic relationships among otherwise well-functioning childhood sexual abuse survivors. Psychol Trauma. 2018;10(1):121-9. pmid: 28447814 doi:10.1037/tra0000271
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
