Volume 22, Issue 4 (9-2019)                   J Arak Uni Med Sci 2019, 22(4): 112-123 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sabbaghi A, Zargar M, Ghaemi A, Motamedi-Sedeh F, Zolfaghari M R. Inactivation of Human Influenza Virus Using Gamma Irradiation. J Arak Uni Med Sci 2019; 22 (4) :112-123
URL: http://jams.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-6076-en.html
1- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic Science, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.
2- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic Science, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran. , zmohsen2002@yahoo.com
3- Department of Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, Virology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
4- Nuclear Agriculture Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Karaj, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 3189 kb]   (1463 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2991 Views)
Full-Text:   (2974 Views)
1. Introduction
Seasonal influenza infection is one of the leading causes of mortality in human communities, especially among at-risk individuals. Nowadays, vaccine design against influenza virus is mainly based on inactivated vaccines, especially vaccines containing broken virions or antigenic subunits (HA and NA proteins) whose efficacy is due to the production of specific antibodies against a particular strain of the virus and cannot provide protection against other influenza virus subtypes [2, 4]. These types of vaccines also require an annual evaluation and modifications [5, 6].
Animal viruses, on the other hand, by exchanging gene fragments, have led to the emergence of new variants of the influenza virus, reducing the protective efficacy of seasonal influenza vaccines in India [5]. Therefore, attention is now focused on the production of complete inactivated vaccines [2].
 Gamma-irradiated influenza viruses (γ-FLU) remain mostly unchanged during treatment. Thus, in this study, we use gamma irradiation to inactivate the human influenza virus strain named A/PR/8/34 [A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1)],  as a candidate for the production of complete inactivated viral vaccines. 
2. Materials and Methods
This experimental study was performed on Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) epithelium cells cultured in sterile and filtered containers with DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium), antibiotic, and 10% of Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS). The containers were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C with 5% CO2 and 95% humidity. The virus used was human influenza A.PR.34.34 strain. The appropriate volume of the virus to infect MDCK cells was determined based on the infection coefficient Multiplicity of Infection (MOI). The virus was then inoculated at the optimum dose into cell culture containers. After 48 hours, the cells were collected from the containers and concentrated by ultrafiltration [13, 14].
Concentrated virus titration was performed using a TCID 50% test [15]. Vials containing condensed viruses were irradiated at doses of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 28, and 30 kg. Finally, the optimal dose of irradiation for the inactivation of the virus was calculated. The total inactivation of the virus was confirmed by the safety test [17]. Antigenic properties of the irradiated virus were compared with a non-irradiated virus by hemagglutination test.
3. Results
According to the results of 4 passages of irradiated samples at 28 and 30 kg doses (Table 1), as well as results related to the evaluation of the preservation of ability of the surface antigenic properties of irradiated virus (Table 2), the dose of 28 kg was determined as the optimal dose of gamma irradiation for total inactivation of the human influenza virus with an initial titration of 105.75 mL by preserving surface antigenic structures as well as the absence of virus replication symptoms in 4 successive passages.







4. Discussion
Inactivation of the influenza virus by chemical treatments such as formalin or β-propiolactone leads to the induction of cross-linking of viral proteins. Thus, the ability of inactivated viruses to penetrate the cytosol of host cells reduces. Physical treatments such as UV rays also impair the effective uptake of these viruses by antigen-presenting cells through disrupting the activity of the lipid membrane of the virus, thereby decreasing the supply of viral antigens may reduce the efficacy of these vaccines [2, 11, 22].
In contrast, the virucidal effect of gamma irradiation is mainly related to the occurrence of virus nucleic acid damage, including a breakdown in the viral genome, cross-fractures, or the occurrence of nucleotide damage [19]. This method uses frozen viruses to minimize unintended damage to protein structures during the virus inactivation process. This is a significant advantage over other traditional methods of sterilization, especially in vaccine manufacturing [23]. Given these advantages, gamma irradiation can be used to inactivate the human influenza virus.
The results of this study showed that doses of 28 and 30 kg of gamma irradiation could deactivate the human influenza A/PR/34/8 virus, without altering the antigenic properties of the virus surface.
Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Islamic Azad University of Tehran Medical Branch (Code: IR.IAU.TMU.REC.1397.309).
Funding
This article was extracted from the PhD. thesis of Ailar Sabaghi approved by  Biology-Microbiology from the Faculty of Science of Islamic Azad University of Qom Branch (No. 508333). 
Authors' contributions
All authors met the standards of writing criteria based on the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Publishers (ICMJE).
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


References
  1. Carrat F, Flahault A. Influenza vaccine: The challenge of antigenic drift. Vaccine. 2007; 25(39-40):6852-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.07.027] [PMID]
  2. Furuya Y, Regner M, Lobigs M, Koskinen A, Mullbacher A, Alsharifi M. Effect of inactivation method on the cross-protective immunity induced by whole ‘killed’ influenza A viruses and commercial vaccine preparations. J Gen Virol. 2010; 91(Pt 6):1450-60. [DOI:10.1099/vir.0.018168-0] [PMID]
  3. Budimir N, Huckriede A, Meijerhof T, Boon L, Gostick E, Price DA, et al. Induction of heterosubtypic cross-protection against influenza by a whole inactivated virus vaccine: The role of viral membrane fusion activity. PLOS One. 2012; 7(1):e30898. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0030898] [PMID] [PMCID]
  4. Geeraedts F, Goutagny N, Hornung V, Severa M, de Haan A, Pool J, et al. Superior immunogenicity of inactivated whole virus H5N1 influenza vaccine is primarily controlled by Toll-like receptor signalling. PLOS Pathog ens. 2008; 4(8):e1000138. [DOI:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000138] [PMID] [PMCID]
  5. Fotouhi F, Shaffifar M, Farahmand B, Shirian S, Saeidi M, Tabarraei A, et al. Adjuvant use of the NKT cell agonist alpha-galactosylceramide leads to enhancement of M2-based DNA vaccine immunogenicity and protective immunity against influenza A virus. Arch Virol. 2017; 162(5):1251-60. [DOI:10.1007/s00705-017-3230-7] [PMID]
  6. Treanor JJ. Prospects for broadly protective influenza vaccines. Vaccine. 2015; 33(Suppl. 4):D39-D45. [DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.053] [PMID]
  7. Kreijtz J, Fouchier R, Rimmelzwaan G. Immune responses to influenza virus infection.Virus Res. 2011; 162(1-2):19-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.virusres.2011.09.022] [PMID]
  8. van de Sandt CE, Kreijtz JH, Rimmelzwaan GF. Evasion of influenza A viruses from innate and adaptive immune responses. Viruses. 2012; 4(9):1438-76. [DOI:10.3390/v4091438] [PMID] [PMCID]
  9. Müllbacher A, Ada G, Tha Hla R. Gamma‐irradiated influenza A virus can prime for a cross‐reactive and cross‐protective immune response against influenza A viruses. Immunol Cell Biol. 1988; 66(2):153-7. [DOI:10.1038/icb.1988.19] [PMID]
  10. Alsharifi M, Furuya Y, Bowden TR, Lobigs M, Koskinen A, Regner M, et al. Intranasal flu vaccine protective against seasonal and H5N1 avian influenza infections. PLOS One. 2009; 4(4):e5336. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0005336] [PMID] [PMCID]
  11. Furuya Y, Chan J, Wan EC, Koskinen A, Diener KR, Hayball JD, et al. Gamma-irradiated influenza virus uniquely induces IFN-I mediated lymphocyte activation independent of the TLR7/MyD88 pathway. PLOS One. 2011; 6(10):e25765. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0025765] [PMID] [PMCID]
  12. González-Jara P, Fraile A, Canto T, García-Arenal F. The multiplicity of infection of a plant virus varies during colonization of its eukaryotic host. J Virol Methods. 2009; 83(15):7487-94. [DOI:10.1128/JVI.00636-09] [PMID] [PMCID]
  13. Wickramasinghe S, Kalbfuss B, Zimmermann A, Thom V, Reichl U. Tangential flow microfiltration and ultrafiltration for human influenza A virus concentration and purification. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005; 92(2):199-208. [DOI:10.1002/bit.20599] [PMID]
  14. Kalbfuss B, Genzel Y, Wolff M, Zimmermann A, Morenweiser R, Reichl U. Harvesting and concentration of human influenza A virus produced in serum‐free mammalian cell culture for the production of vaccines. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007; 97(1):73-85. [DOI:10.1002/bit.21139] [PMID]
  15. Ramakrishnan MA. Determination of 50% endpoint titer using a simple formula. World J Virol. 2016; 5(2):85-6. [DOI:10.5501/wjv.v5.i2.85] [PMID] [PMCID]
  16. American Society For Testing and Materials. Standard practice for using the fricke reference standard dosimetry system. Barr Harbor: ASTM International West Conshohocken; 2004.
  17. Motamedi-Sedeh F, Mahravani H, Javadi M, Harzandi N, Shafaei SK. FMD virus type Asia-1 irradiated vaccine and evaluation of immune response on guinea-pig model. Biol J Microorganism. 2017; 6(23):57-66.
  18. Killian ML. Hemagglutination assay for influenza virus. Methods in Mol Biol. 2014; 1161:3-9. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4939-0758-8_1] [PMID]
  19. Alsharifi M, Müllbacher A. The γ-irradiated influenza vaccine and the prospect of producing safe vaccines in general. Immunol Cell Biol. 2010; 88(2):103. [DOI:10.1038/icb.2009.81] [PMID]
  20. Tsen S-WD, Donthi N, La V, Hsieh WH, Li YD, Knoff J, et al. Chemical-free inactivated whole influenza virus vaccine prepared by ultrashort pulsed laser treatment. J Biomed Optics. 2014; 20(5):051008. [DOI:10.1117/1.JBO.20.5.051008] [PMID] [PMCID]
  21. Barrett PN, Terpening SJ, Snow D, Cobb RR, Kistner O. Vero cell technology for rapid development of inactivated whole virus vaccines for emerging viral diseases. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017; 16(9):883-94. [DOI:10.1080/14760584.2017.1357471] [PMID]
  22. Furuya Y, Chan J, Regner M, Lobigs M, Koskinen A, Kok T, et al. Cytotoxic T cells are the predominant players providing cross-protective immunity induced by γ-irradiated influenza A viruses. J Virol. 2010; 84(9):4212-21. [DOI:10.1128/JVI.02508-09] [PMID] [PMCID]
  23. David SC, Lau J, Singleton EV, Babb R, Davies J, Hirst TR, et al. The effect of gamma-irradiation conditions on the immunogenicity of whole-inactivated Influenza A virus vaccine. Vaccine. 2017; 35(7):1071-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.044] [PMID]
  24. Pollard E. The action of ionizing radiation on viruses. In: Kenneth M. Smith, Max A, Lauffer, editors. Advances in Virus Research. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 1954. [DOI:10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60531-X]
  25. Frescura T, Vivoli P. Studies of the foot‐and‐mouth disease virus sub‐types using antigens inactivated by Gamma radiations. Zentralblatt Fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. J Vet Med. 1973; 20(10):822-5. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0450.1973.tb02055.x] [PMID]
  26. Lugovtsev VY, Melnyk D, Weir JP. Heterogeneity of the MDCK cell line and its applicability for influenza virus research. PLOS One. 2013; 8(9):e75014. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0075014] [PMID] [PMCID]
  27. Salehi B, Motamedi-Sedeh F, Madadgar O, Khalili I, Ghalyan Chi Langroudi A, et al. Analysis of antigen conservation and inactivation of gamma-irradiated avian influenza virus subtype H9N2. Acta microbiologica et Immunologica Hungarica. 2018; 65(2):163-71. [DOI:10.1556/030.65.2018.025] [PMID]
  28. Grieb T, Forng RY, Brown R, Owolabi T, Maddox E, Mcbain A, et al. Effective use of gamma irradiation for pathogen inactivation of monoclonal antibody preparations. Biologicals. 2002; 30(3):207-16. [DOI:10.1006/biol.2002.0330] [PMID]
  29. Gayen M, Gupta P, Morazzani EM, Gaidamakova EK, Knollmann-Ritschel B, Daly MJ, et al. Deinococcus Mn(2+)-peptide complex: A novel approach to alphavirus vaccine development. Vaccine. 2017; 35(29):3672-81. [DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.016] [PMID]
  30. Alok A, Chaudhury N. Tetracycline hydrochloride: A potential clinical drug for radioprotection. Chemico-Biological Interact. 2016; 245:90-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.cbi.2016.01.001] [PMID]
Type of Study: Original Atricle | Subject: Basic Sciences
Received: 2019/05/13 | Accepted: 2019/08/24

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Arak University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb