Volume 24, Issue 4 (October & November 2021)                   J Arak Uni Med Sci 2021, 24(4): 554-565 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hasheminejad A S, Shafiee Tabar M, Akbari Chermahini S. The Effects of High Power and Low Power Posing on Students’ Pain Threshold. J Arak Uni Med Sci 2021; 24 (4) :554-565
URL: http://jams.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-6568-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak, Iran.
2- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak, Iran. , m-shafietabar@araku.ac.ir
Full-Text [PDF 4394 kb]   (431 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1232 Views)
Full-Text:   (863 Views)
1. Introduction
Pain is complex and multidimensional perception, influenced by psychological factors, which include a set of cognitive (e.g., attention), behavioral (e.g., specific behavioral responses when experiencing pain), and emotional (sadness, hopelessness, fear, & anxiety respecting aggravate pain) aspects, which plays an essential role in modulating the perception of pain [3].
A psychological approach that can considerably relieve pain is power posture [4, 7]. Power posture, expressed in expansive body postures, can lead to changes in humans’ power-related feelings, thinking, and behavior. Therefore, the effects of using power posture mediated by hormonal and neurological factors on the pain threshold are expected. Bohns and Wiltermuth (2012) suggested that participants with a power posture had a higher pain threshold than individuals with a neutral or obedient gesture [7]. However, Ge, Bennett, and Oller’s (2017) findings did not reflect the effects of power gestures on pain threshold [4]. Therefore, considering the contradiction between the results of power gesture research, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of pretending high/low power gestures on pain threshold.
2. Materials & Methods
This study was a quasi-experimental study with pre-test-post-test and a control group design. Accordingly, the convenience sampling method selected 60 female students affiliated with Arak University with a mean±SD age of 20.2±2.5 years in 2016-2017. The study participants were randomly divided into 3 groups of 20 subjects, including high power posture (sitting on a chair with legs on the table, arms behind & head held up), low power posture (sitting on a chair with legs crossed, arms between legs & bending the head down), and without posture as the control group. After pre-test measurements and two minutes of poses, the post-test was performed immediately. Research tools included Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and blood pressure cuff, and pain thresholds were recorded in millimeters of mercury, a standard unit used to report blood pressure [7]. To perform high/low power posture in this study, the gestures of Carney et al. (2010) were used with the exact instructions. The study subjects performed each gesture for one minute (two minutes per person per group) between the pre-test and post-test intervals [9]. The principles of confidentiality of the study participants’ information were observed. 
3. Results
One-Way Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was used to evaluate the effects of power posture on pain threshold. The results of this test are reported in Table 1.

The ANCOVA results indicated that the difference in the adjusted mean score of pain threshold in the high-power posture group (81.94), the low- power gesture group (63.87), and the control group (74.41) was significant according to the F statistic at the level of 0.001 (Figure 1).

Thus, pretending a high-power posture increases the pain threshold, and a low-power posture decreases it in university students.
4. Discussion & Conclusion 
This study aimed to investigate the effects of pretending power posture on changing the pain threshold of a group of female students. The obtained results were in line with the results of Bohns and Wiltermuth (2012) [7]; however, our findings were inconsistent with those of research by Ge, Bennett, and Oller (2017) [4]. According to Carney et al. (2010), the gesture of power increases testosterone and decreases cortisol [9]; increased power is also associated with the behavioral activation system, and decreased power is associated with the behavioral inhibition system [16]. Behavioral activation system with mesolimbic dopamine nerve cell activity leads to relief and the reduction of pain sensitivity [2829]. Furthermore, testosterone and the left prefrontal cortex activity increase the pain threshold by affecting beta-endorphins, neurotransmitters, and other neuropeptides [30, 31]. Cortisol also helps relieve pain by altering hippocampal. 
Bohns and Wiltermuth (2012) suggested that the study participants with a power posture had a higher pain threshold than those with a neutral or obedient gesture [7]. These studies indicated a negative relationship between cortisol and a positive relationship between testosterone and pain threshold [17], a negative relationship between the behavioral activation system, and a positive relationship between the behavioral inhibition system and pain [18]. Therefore, hormonal and neurological factors can be considered for power gestures’ effect on the pain threshold. To explain the inconsistency of the present study findings with those of the research by Ge, Bennett, and Oller (2017), it is necessary to outline the difference in gestation time, gesture differences, the lack of control group, and the use of hand muscle dynamometer to measure pain threshold in Ge et al.’s investigation; using power gestures as a simple tool in pain situations are recommended for pain management or as a supplement to analgesics.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

The Research Ethics Committee of Arak University of Medical Sciences approved this study (Code: REC.1399.276). Participation in this study was informed and voluntary, and participants could withdraw at any study stage. 

Funding
This research was extracted from the MA. thesis of the first author at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak.

Authors' contributions
All authors contributed equally to the preparation of this article. 

Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.


References
  1. Institute of Medicine. Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research.  Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. https://books.google.com/books/about/Relieving_Pain_in_America.html?id=rTTRy1sjs3QC&source=kp_book_description
  2. Dworkin RH, Backonja M, Rowbotham MC, Allen RR, Argoff CR, Bennett GJ, et al. Advances in neuropathic pain: Diagnosis, mechanisms, and treatment recommendations. Arch Neurol. 2003; 60(11):1524-34. [DOI:10.1001/archneur.60.11.1524] [PMID]
  3. McGrath PA. Psychological aspects of pain perception. Arch Oral Biol. 1994; 39:S55-62. [DOI:10.1016/0003-9969(94)90189-9]
  4. Ge W, Bennett TK, Oller JC. Should high-power posing be integrated in physical therapy? J Phys Ther Sci. 2017; 29(4):697-701. [DOI:10.1589/jpts.29.697] [PMID] [PMCID]
  5. Wager TD, Rilling JK, Smith EE, Sokolik A, Casey KL, Davidson RJ, et al. Placebo-induced changes in FMRI in the anticipation and experience of pain. Science. 2004; 303(5661):1162-7. [DOI:10.1126/science.1093065] [PMID]
  6. Linton SJ, Shaw WS. Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain. Phys Ther. 2011; 91(5):700-11. [DOI:10.2522/ptj.20100330] [PMID]
  7. Bohns VK, Wiltermuth SS. It hurts when I do this (or you do that): Posture and pain tolerance. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012; 48(1):341-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.022]
  8. Niedenthal PM. Embodying emotion. Science. 2007; 316(5827):1002-5. [DOI:10.1126/science.1136930] [PMID]
  9. Carney DR, Cuddy AJ, Yap AJ. Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(10):1363-8. [DOI:10.1177/0956797610383437] [PMID]
  10. Huang L, Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH, Guillory LE. Powerful postures versus powerful roles: Which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior? Psychol Sci. 2011; 22(1):95-102. [DOI:10.1177/0956797610391912] [PMID]
  11. Ranehill E, Dreber A, Johannesson M, Leiberg S, Sul S, Weber RA. Assessing the robustness of power posing: No effect on hormones and risk tolerance in a large sample of men and women. Psychol Sci. 2015; 26(5):653-6. [DOI:10.1177/0956797614553946] [PMID]
  12. Cuddy AJ, Wilmuth CA, Yap AJ, Carney DR. Preparatory power posing affects nonverbal presence and job interview performance. J Appl Psychol. 2015; 100(4):1286-95. [DOI:10.1037/a0038543] [PMID]
  13. Park LE, Streamer L, Huang L, Galinsky AD. Stand tall, but don’t put your feet up: Universal and culturally-specific effects of expansive postures on power. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013; 49(6):965-71. [DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.001]
  14. Gronau QF, Van Erp S, Heck DW, Cesario J, Jonas KJ, Wagenmakers EJ. A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors: The case of felt power. Compr Results Soc Psychol. 2017; 2(1):123-38. [DOI:10.1080/23743603.2017.1326760]
  15. Cuddy A. Presence: Bringing your boldest self to your biggest challenges. Boston: Little, Brown; 2015. https://books.google.com/books/about/Presence.html?id=-DuCjwEACAAJ&source=kp_book_description
  16. Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychol Rev. 2003; 110(2):265-84. [DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265] [PMID]
  17. Choi JC, Chung MI, Lee YD. Modulation of pain sensation by stress-related testosterone and cortisol. Anaesthesia. 2012; 67(10):1146-51. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07267.x] [PMID]
  18. Jensen MP, Tan G, Chua SM. Pain intensity, headache frequency, and the behavioral activation and inhibition systems. Clin J Pain. 2015; 31(12):1068-74. [DOI:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000215] [PMID]
  19. Körner R, Petersen LE, Schütz A. Do expansive or contractive body postures affect feelings of self-worth? High power poses impact state self-esteem. Curr Psychol. 2019; 40(8):4112–24. [DOI:10.1007/s12144-019-00371-1]
  20. VandenBos GR. APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 2007. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-11044-000
  21. Baumeister RF. Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013. https://books.google.com/books/about/Self_Esteem.html?id=4ZeyBwAAQBAJ
  22. Liu SY, Wrosch C, Miller GE, Pruessner JC. Self-esteem change and diurnal cortisol secretion in older adulthood. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014; 41:111-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.12.010] [PMID]
  23. LePine JA, Van Dyne L. Predicting voice behavior in work groups. J Appl Psychol. 1998; 83(6):853-68. [DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853]
  24. Buhrmester D, Furman W, Wittenberg MT, Reis HT. Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 55(6):991-1008. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.991] [PMID]
  25. Pullmann H, Allik J. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Its dimensionality, stability and personality correlates in Estonian. Pers Individ Dif. 2000; 28(4):701-15. [DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00132-4]
  26. Mohammadi N. [Preliminary review of the validity and reliability of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Persian)]. J Dev Psychol Iran Psychol. 2005; 1(4):55-62. http://jip.azad.ac.ir/article_512444.html?lang=en
  27. Greenberger E, Chen C, Dmitrieva J, Farruggia SP. Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Do they matter? Pers Individ Dif. 2003; 35(6):1241-54. [DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00331-8]
  28. Altier N, Stewart J. Intra-VTA infusions of the substance P analogue, DiMe-C7, and intra-accumbens infusions of amphetamine induce analgesia in the formalin test for tonic pain. Brain Res. 1993; 628(1-2):279-85. [DOI:10.1016/0006-8993(93)90965-P]
  29. Wood PB. Mesolimbic dopaminergic mechanisms and pain control. Pain. 2006; 120(3):230-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2005.12.014] [PMID]
  30. Padnekar JR, Mulgaonker VK. Role of testosterone on pain threshold in rats. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1995; 39(4):423-4. [PMID]
  31. Choi JC, Park SK, Kim YH, Shin YW, Kwon JS, Kim JS, et al. Different brain activation patterns to pain and pain-related unpleasantness during the menstrual cycle. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105(1):120-7. [DOI:10.1097/00000542-200607000-00021] [PMID]
  32. Vachon-Presseau E, Roy M, Martel MO, Caron E, Marin MF, Chen J, et al. The stress model of chronic pain: Evidence from basal cortisol and hippocampal structure and function in humans. Brain. 2013; 136(3):815-27. [DOI:10.1093/brain/aws371] [PMID]
  33. McCaul KD, Malott JM. Distraction and coping with pain. Psychol Bull. 1984; 95(3):516-33. [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.516] [PMID]
  34. Bandura A, Reese L, Adams NE. Microanalysis of action and fear arousal as a function of differential levels of perceived self-efficacy. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982; 43(1):5-21. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.5] [PMID]
  35. Bandura A, O’Leary A, Taylor CB, Gauthier J, Gossard D. Perceived self-efficacy and pain control: Opioid and nonopioid mechanisms. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987; 53(3):563-71. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.563] [PMID]
  36. Litt MD. Self-efficacy and perceived control: Cognitive mediators of pain tolerance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(1):149-60. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.149] [PMID]
  37. Fast NJ, Gruenfeld DH, Sivanathan N, Galinsky AD. Illusory control: A generative force behind power’s far-reaching effects. Psychol Sci. 2009; 20(4):502-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02311.x] [PMID]
 
Type of Study: Original Atricle | Subject: General
Received: 2020/12/28 | Accepted: 2021/06/19

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Arak University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb