Volume 24, Issue 6 (February & March 2022)                   J Arak Uni Med Sci 2022, 24(6): 804-819 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghaheri B, Tahmasebi Boroujeni S, Shahbazi M, Arshi A R. Dynamic Evaluation of Motor Coordination and Variability in Children with and without Developmental Coordination Disorder. J Arak Uni Med Sci 2022; 24 (6) :804-819
URL: http://jams.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-6875-en.html
1- Department of Motor Control and Learning, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. , shahzadtahmaseb@ut.ac.ir
3- Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
4- Biomechanics and Sports Engineering Groups, Biomedical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 5567 kb]   (1294 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1951 Views)
Full-Text:   (2471 Views)
1. Introduction
Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impaired ability to acquire and execute coordinated motor skills which interferes with the daily activities and academic performance [1]. While lack of motor coordination skills and clumsiness are widely studied among children with DCD, the knowledge of mechanisms underlying this disorder is still limited. Commonly used screening methods are result-oriented which solely measure the outcome of the movement. Process-oriented methods can provide information regarding the strategies used to perform a movement and help design effective interventions.
Evaluating motor variability is an important method to know the underlying process of coordination, and can be used for understanding the central mechanisms of the motor system [12]. Few studies have examined motor variability in children with DCD. This study aims to evaluate the motor variability of children with DCD using a dynamic approach based on a contralateral hand-foot coordination task. Moreover, the symmetry of the coordination pattern was examined in two groups of DCD and non-DCD children.
2. Materials & Methods
Using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children- Second Edition (MABC-2), 15 children with DCD and 20 children without DCD aged 7-10 years were assessed. To assess their coordination and variability, they were asked to perform a contralateral hand-foot marching task (e.g., coordination between right hand and left foot) in the sagittal plane (in-phase coordination). Three trials of 30 seconds were performed and participants were asked to carry out the task at a preferred frequency.
Movements were recorded and analyzed using VICON motion capture system; the continuous relative phase (CRP) and standard deviation of CRP were calculated to measure coordination and variability, respectively. According to the defined task, the CRP close to zero represents greater coordination ability (Figure 1).

3. Results
Figure 2 illustrates the mean of CRP and variability of the CRP in DCD and Non-DCD groups.

Children with DCD showed significantly higher variability (P=0.028). However, the CRP was not significantly different between the groups (P=0.739). 
Moreover, the results revealed a significant difference between the variability of right hand-left foot and left hand-right foot coordination in children with DCD (Z=-2.10, P=0.036) (Table 1).


Finally, we found a significant negative correlation between participants’ coordination variability and their motor competence score in MABC-2; variability could explain 32% of the variance in the motor competence.
4. Discussion & Conclusion
Children with DCD showed more variability in coordinating their contralateral hands and foots, and their coordination had asymmetry. Moreover, children with more coordination variability had lower level of motor competence in MABC-2. Increased variability has been observed in patients with DCD under different tasks [17181920] and several explanations have been provided. For instance, it is suggested that the increased variability in these children is due to a significant noise in their neuro-motor system [21]. However, in the current study no difference was found between the performance of children with and without DCD in the marching task. According to the dynamic systems theory, the increased variability can be a compensatory strategy for children with DCD to explore the solution for executing the task properly [26]. This can explain the higher variability in children with DCD, although they were not significantly different with non-DCD children in performing the task.  
The asymmetry of the variability in children with DCD is associated with their deficit in integrating the sensory information such as proprioceptive feedback [20]. However, the research in this area is still sparse, and more studies are needed to explore the underlying mechanisms. The negative correlation between the coordination variability and motor competence in children highlights the importance of process-oriented measures and dynamic approach for comprehensive understanding of the motor difficulties in children with DCD.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

The current study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran (Code: IR.UT.SPORT.REC.1396030).

Funding
This study was extracted from the PhD. Dissertation of the first author at the Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran.

Authors' contributions
All authors met the standard criteria for writing based on the recommendations of the International Committee of Publishers of Medical Journals (ICMJE).

Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all parents and children who participated in this study for their cooperation.

 
References
  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. https://books.google.com/books/about/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Men.html?id=-JivBAAAQBAJ
  2. Draghi TTG, Cavalcante Neto JL, Rohr LA, Jelsma LD, Tudella E. Symptoms of anxiety and depression in children with developmental coordination disorder: a systematic review. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2020; 96(1):8-19. [DOI:10.1016/j.jped.2019.03.002] [PMID]
  3. Liberman L, Ratzon N, Bart O. The profile of performance skills and emotional factors in the context of participation among young children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 2013; 34(1):87-94. [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.019] [PMID]
  4. Ghaheri B, Sheikh M, Memari AH, Hemayattalab R. [Investigating level of daily physical activity in children with high functioning autism and its relation with age and autism severity (Persian)]. Arak Med Univ J. 2013; 16 (8):70-81. https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=425779
  5. Katartzi ES, Vlachopoulos SP. Motivating children with developmental coordination disorder in school physical education: The self-determination theory approach. Res Dev Disabil. 2011; 32(6):2674-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.06.005] [PMID]
  6. Smith M, Ward E, Williams CM, Banwell HA. Differences in walking and running gait in children with and without developmental coordination disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture. 2021; 83:177-84. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.10.013] [PMID]
  7. Hendrix C, Prins M, Dekkers H. Developmental coordination disorder and overweight and obesity in children: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2014; 15(5):408-23. [DOI:10.1111/obr.12137] [PMID]
  8. Blank R, Barnett AL, Cairney J, Green D, Kirby A, Polatajko H, et al. International clinical practice recommendations on the definition, diagnosis, assessment, intervention, and psychosocial aspects of developmental coordination disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019; 61(3):242-85. [DOI:10.1111/dmcn.14132] [PMID] [PMCID]
  9. Baghernia R, Asle Mohammadizadeh M. [Prevalence of developmental coordination disorder in iranian 3-to-11-year-old children (Persian)]. J Res Rehabil Sci. 2014; 9(6):1077-99. http://jrrs.mui.ac.ir/article_16774.html
  10. Kirby A, Sugden D, Beveridge S, Edwards L. Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) in adolescents and adults in further and higher education. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2008; 8(3):120-31. [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2008.00111.x]
  11. Bardid F, Vannozzi G, Logan SW, Hardy LL, Barnett LM. A hitchhiker’s guide to assessing young people’s motor competence: Deciding what method to use. J Sci Med Sport. 2019; 22(3):311-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2018.08.007] [PMID]
  12. Adolph KE, Cole WG, Vereijken B. Intraindividual variability in the development of motor skills in childhood. In: Diehl M, Hooker K, Sliwinski MJ, editors. Handbook of intraindividual variability across the life span.1th ed. England: Routledge; 2014. https://www.routledge.com/Handbook-of-Intraindividual-Variability-Across-the-Life-Span/Diehl-Hooker-Sliwinski/p/book/9781138799851
  13. Pacheco MM, Lafe CW, Newell KM. Search strategies in practice: testing the effect of inherent variability on search patterns. Ecol Psychol. 2020; 32(2-3):115-38. [DOI:10.1080/10407413.2020.1781536]
  14. Jequier Gygax M, Maillard AM, Favre J. Could gait biomechanics become a marker of atypical neuronal circuitry in human development?-The example of autism spectrum disorder. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:624522. [DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2021.624522] [PMID] [PMCID]
  15. Geuze R, Kalverboer A. Inconsistency and adaptation in timing of clumsy children. J Hum Mov Stud. 1987; 13(8):421-32. https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/inconsistency-and-adaptation-in-timing-of-clumsy-children
  16. Williams HG, Woollacott MH, Ivry R. Timing and motor control in clumsy children. J Mot Behav. 1992; 24(2):165-72. [DOI:10.1080/00222895.1992.9941612] [PMID]
  17. Mackenzie SJ, Getchell N, Deutsch K, Wilms-Floet A, Clark JE, Whitall J. Multi-limb coordination and rhythmic variability under varying sensory availability conditions in children with DCD. Hum Mov Sci. 2008; 27(2):256-69. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.010] [PMID] [PMCID]
  18. Smits-Engelsman BC, Westenberg Y, Duysens J. Children with developmental coordination disorder are equally able to generate force but show more variability than typically developing children. Hum Mov Sci. 2008; 27(2):296-309. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.005] [PMID]
  19. Rosengren KS, Deconinck FJ, DiBerardino 3rd LA, Polk JD, Spencer-Smith J, De Clercq D, et al. Differences in gait complexity and variability between children with and without developmental coordination disorder. Gait Posture. 2009; 29(2):225-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.08.005] [PMID]
  20. Wilmut K, Du W, Barnett A. Gait patterns in children with developmental coordination disorder. Exp Brain Res. 2016; 234(6):1747-55. [DOI:10.1007/s00221-016-4592-x] [PMID]
  21. Smits-Engelsman BC, Wilson PH. Noise, variability, and motor performance in developmental coordination disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013; 55(S 4):69-72. [DOI:10.1111/dmcn.12311] [PMID]
  22. Bo J, Bastian AJ, Kagerer FA, Contreras-Vidal JL, Clark JE. Temporal variability in continuous versus discontinuous drawing for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Neurosci Lett. 2008; 431(3):215-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.040] [PMID] [PMCID]
  23. Volman MJ, Geuze RH. Relative phase stability of bimanual and visuomanual rhythmic coordination patterns in children with a developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 1998; 17(4-5):541-72. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-9457(98)00013-X]
  24. Wade MG, Kazeck M. Developmental coordination disorder and its cause: The road less travelled. Hum Mov Sci. 2018; 57:489-500. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2016.08.004] [PMID]
  25. Herzfeld DJ, Shadmehr R. Motor variability is not noise, but grist for the learning mill. Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17(2):149-50. [DOI:10.1038/nn.3633] [PMID]
  26. Caballero C, Davids K, Heller B, Wheat J, Moreno FJ. Movement variability emerges in gait as adaptation to task constraints in dynamic environments. Gait Posture. 2019; 70:1-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.02.002] [PMID]
  27. Hadders-Algra M. Variation and variability: key words in human motor development. Phys Ther. 2010; 90(12):1823-37. [DOI:10.2522/ptj.20100006] [PMID]
  28. Golenia L, Bongers RM, van Hoorn JF, Otten E, Mouton LJ, Schoemaker MM. Variability in coordination patterns in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Hum Mov Sci. 2018; 60:202-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2018.06.009] [PMID]
  29. Draper ER. A treadmill-based system for measuring symmetry of gait. Med Eng Phys. 2000; 22(3):215-22. [DOI:10.1016/S1350-4533(00)00026-6]
  30. Goble D, Marino G, Potvin J. The influence of horizontal velocity on interlimb symmetry in normal walking. Hum Mov Sci. 2003; 22(3):271-83. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-9457(03)00047-2]
  31. Wilmut K, Gentle J, Barnett A. Gait symmetry in individuals with and without Developmental Coordination Disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 2017; 60:107-14. [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.11.016] [PMID]
  32. Henderson S, Sugden D, Barnett A. Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2: MABC-2). 2th ed. London, UK: Pearson Assessment; 2007. [DOI:10.1037/t55281-000]
  33. Blank R, Smits-Engelsman B, Polatajko H, Wilson P. European Academy for Childhood Disability (EACD): Recommendations on the definition, diagnosis and intervention of developmental coordination disorder (long version). Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012; 54(1):54-93. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04171.x] [PMID]
  34. Akbaripour R, Daneshfar A, Shojaei M. [Reliability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-(MABC-2) in children aged 7-10 years in Tehran (Persian)]. Sci J Rehabil Med. 2018; 7(4):90-6. [DOI:10.22037/JRM.2018.111121.1776]
  35. Gueugnon M, Salesse RN, Coste A, Zhao Z, Bardy BG, Marin L. Postural coordination during socio-motor improvisation. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:1168. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01168] [PMID] [PMCID]
  36. Gabis LV, Shefer S, Portnoy S. Variability of coordination in typically developing children versus children with Autism spectrum disorder with and without rhythmic signal. Sensors. 2020; 20(10):2769. [DOI:10.3390/s20102769] [PMID] [PMCID]
  37. Davids K, Glazier P, Araújo D, Bartlett R. Movement systems as dynamical systems: the functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine. Sports Med. 2003; 33(4):245-60. [DOI:10.2165/00007256-200333040-00001] [PMID]
  38. Lee MH, Farshchiansadegh A, Ranganathan R. Children show limited movement repertoire when learning a novel motor skill. Dev Sci. 2018; 21(4):e12614. [DOI:10.1111/desc.12614] [PMCID]
  39. Manicolo O, Brotzmann M, Hagmann-von Arx P, Grob A, Weber P. Gait in children with infantile/atypical autism: Age-dependent decrease in gait variability and associations with motor skills. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2019; 23(1):117-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.09.011] [PMID]
  40. Larkin D, Hoare D. Out of step: Coordinating kids' movement. Ferryhill: Active Life Foundation; 1991. [Link]
  41. Minshew NJ, Sung K, Jones BL, Furman JM. Underdevelopment of the postural control system in autism. Neurology. 2004; 63(11):2056-61. [DOI:10.1212/01.WNL.0000145771.98657.62] [PMID]
Type of Study: Original Atricle | Subject: General
Received: 2021/04/20 | Accepted: 2021/11/13

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Arak University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb