Volume 27, Issue 1 (3-2024)                   J Arak Uni Med Sci 2024, 27(1): 17-23 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Afrasiabi S, Goudarzvand M, Sedighi A S, Shafikhani Y, Ghanbari B. Evaluating the Rate of Primacy and Recency in Learning Word Series in Neglected Patients with Right Posterior Parietal Lobe Lesion. J Arak Uni Med Sci 2024; 27 (1) :17-23
URL: http://jams.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-7717-en.html
1- Alborz University of Medical Sciences
2- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Chief-coordinator and Head Assistant of Dean of Transplant and Organ Donation Faculty of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Trauma and Injury Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , g.behrooz@gmail.com
Abstract:   (297 Views)
Introduction: Sequential word learning is a crucial aspect of memory research in cognitive neuroscience, emphasizing the importance of recalling words at the beginning (primacy) and end (recency) of a sequence. This study aims to investigate the extent of primacy and recency effects in patients with neglect syndrome caused by right parietal lobe damage.
Methods: This case-control study involved 18 patients with parietal lobe tumors, divided into two groups: 9 patients with neglect syndrome and nine without. Patients referred to the neurosurgery department of Shahid Tajrish Hospital with right parietal lobe lesions underwent neurological and psychological evaluations, including the cancellation test, line bisection test, copying test, and the 5-point test. Those diagnosed with neglect syndrome formed the syndrome group, while the rest constituted the control group. Both groups participated in immediate recall (short-term memory) and delayed recall (long-term memory) tests for sequential word learning, with results analyzed for primacy and recency effects.
Results: Among the 18 patients, 61% were men and 39% were women. Analysis of immediate and short-term memory tests for sequential word learning revealed no significant differences in primacy and recency effects between the two groups.
Conclusions: The findings suggest that patients with right parietal lobe damage and neglect syndrome do not exhibit significant differences in primacy or recency effects in verbal memory during sequential word learning compared to the control group. Consequently, immediate and short-term memory appears relatively unaffected in these patients.
Full-Text [PDF 1061 kb]   (158 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Atricle | Subject: Internal
Received: 2024/05/19 | Accepted: 2024/08/18

References
1. Li K, Malhotra PA. Spatial neglect. Pract Neurol. 2015;15(5):333-9. pmid: 26023203 doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2015-001115
2. Rode G, Pagliari C, Huchon L, Rossetti Y, Pisella L. Semiology of neglect: an update. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;60(3):177-85. pmid: 27103056 doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.03.003
3. Kim M, Na DL, Kim GM, Adair JC, Lee KH, Heilman KM. Ipsilesional neglect: behavioural and anatomical features. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;67(1):35-8. pmid: 10369819 doi: 10.1136/jnnp.67.1.35
4. Mort DJ, Malhotra P, Mannan SK, Rorden C, Pambakian A, Kennard C, et al. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 9):1986-97. pmid: 12821519 doi: 10.1093/brain/awg200
5. 5. Stone SP, Halligan PW, Greenwood RJ. The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke. Age Ageing. 1993;22(1):46-52. pmid: 8438666 doi: 10.1093/ageing/22.1.46
6. Machner B, Mah YH, Gorgoraptis N, Husain M. How reliable is
7. repeated testing for hemispatial neglect? Implications for clinical follow-up and treatment trials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(10):1032-4. pmid: 22923514 doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303296
8. Jehkonen M, Laihosalo M, Koivisto AM, Dastidar P, Ahonen JP. Fluctuation in spontaneous recovery of left visual neglect: a 1-year follow-up. Eur Neurol. 2007;58(4):210-4. pmid: 17823534 doi: 10.1159/000107941
9. Bailey MJ, Riddoch MJ, Crome P. Treatment of visual neglect in elderly patients with stroke: a single-subject series using either a scanning and cueing strategy or a left-limb activation strategy. Physical Therapy. 2002;82(8):782-97. pmid: 12147008 doi: 10.1093/ptj/82.8.782
10. Deese J, Kaufman RA. Serial effects in recall of unorganized and sequentially organized verbal material. J Exp Psychol. 1957;54(3):180-87. doi: 10.1037/h0040536
11. 10. Murdock Jr BB. The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1962;64(5):482. doi: 10.1037/h0045106
12. Antoine S, Ranzini M, van Dijck JP, Slama H, Bonato M,
13. Tousch A, et al. Hemispatial neglect and serial order in verbal working memory. J Neuropsychol. 2019;13(2):272-88. pmid: 29316244 doi: 10.1111/jnp.12145
14. Malhotra P, Jäger HR, Parton A, Greenwood R, Playford ED, Brown MM, et al. Spatial working memory capacity in unilateral neglect. Brain. 2005;128(2):424-35. pmid: 15644422 doi: 10.1093/brain/awh372
15. Vuilleumier P, Ortigue S, Brugger P. The number space and neglect. Cortex. 2004;40(2):399-410. pmid: 15156797 doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70134-5
16. Doricchi F, Guariglia P, Gasparini M, Tomaiuolo F. Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(12):1663-5. pmid: 16261135 doi: 10.1038/nn1563
17. Schenkenberg T, Bradford DC, Ajax ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology. 1980;30(5):509-17. pmid: 7189256 doi: 10.1212/wnl.30.5.509
18. Rapcsak SZ, Verfaellie M, Fleet S, Heilman KM. Selective attention in hemispatial neglect. Arch Neurol. 1989;46(2):178-82. pmid: 2916956 doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520380082018
19. Ferber S, Karnath HO. How to assess spatial neglect-line bisection or cancellation tasks? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001;23(5):599-607. pmid: 11778637 doi: 10.1076/jcen.23.5.599.1243
20. Hall JE. Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology E-Boo. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010.
21. Saj A, Verdon V, Vocat R, Vuilleumier P. The anatomy underlying acute versus chronic spatial neglect’also depends on clinical tests. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 2):e207-e207. pmid: 21930660 doi: 10.1093/brain/awr227
22. van Dijck JP, Abrahamse EL, Majerus S, Fias W. Spatial attention interacts with serial-order retrieval from verbal working memory. Psychol Sci. 2013;24(9):1854-9. pmid: 23863755 doi: 10.1177/0956797613479610
23. Motahare Hejazi S, Haghgoo HA, Karbalaei Nouri A, Biglarian A, Akbarfahimi N. The relationship between memory impairment and health indicators of the elderly with Parkinson disease [in Persian]. Salmand. 2019 Mar 30;666-75. doi: 10.32598/SIJA.13.Special-Issue.666
24. Sadeghi F, Geshani A, Jafari Z, Jalaei S. Assessment of auditory verbal memory / learning performance in 9 to 11-year-old children [in Persian]. MRJ. 2014;8(3):54-61.
25. Jahan A, Baratzadeh S, Nilipour R. Phonological similarity effect on span of verbal short term memory in Persian [in Persian]. Med J Tabriz Univ Med Sci. 2008;30(3):37-40.
26. Matloubi S, Mohammadzadeh A, Jafari Z, Akbarzade Baghban ar. Effect of background music on auditory-verbal memory performance [in Persian]. Auditory and Vestibular Research. 2014;23(5):27-34.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Arak University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb