Volume 27, Issue 2 (5-2024)
J Arak Uni Med Sci 2024, 27(2): 82-89 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kamalinia M, Zahrakar K, Arabzadeh M. Development of Structural Equations Model of Resilience Based on Cognitive Flexibility with the Mediation of Marital Intimacy in Married Female Nurses. J Arak Uni Med Sci 2024; 27 (2) :82-89
URL: http://jams.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-7796-en.html
URL: http://jams.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-7796-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Faculty of human science, Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran
2- Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran ,dr_zahrakar@khu.ac.ir
3- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran
2- Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran ,
3- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran
Abstract: (644 Views)
Introduction: Resilience is a component that plays a meaningful role in enduring the hardships of the work and marriage environment. Therefore, it is identified as the main structure of personality, so it is influential to identify variables that can predict resilience.
Methods: The current research is based on the fundamental goal and the descriptive data collection method of the structural equation model correlation. The statistical population of the research consists of all married female nurses of hospitals and government treatment centers in Alborz province in 1401, who were selected by a multi-stage cluster sampling method of 400 people from different treatment units and departments. In this research, the Conner and Davidson resilience questionnaire (2003), Dennis and Vanderwaal cognitive flexibility scale (2001), and Bagaroozi marital intimacy scale (2001) were used to analyze data from Amos version 24 software.
Results: For cognitive flexibility leading to marital intimacy, the value was 2.023. The value for the path of mental flexibility to resilience was 0.986, and for marital intimacy to resilience, it was 0.909. The critical ratio between cognitive flexibility (r= 0.767) and marital intimacy
(r = 0.796) had a positive and significant relationship with resilience at a significance level
of 0.01.
Conclusions: The results showed that the data fit the conceptual model of the research. Also, the mediating role of marital intimacy between cognitive flexibility and resilience was confirmed. According to the results obtained, to increase the resilience of married female nurses, it is suggested to health officials to Different cognitive, emotional and emotional variables of this group should be given special attention.
Methods: The current research is based on the fundamental goal and the descriptive data collection method of the structural equation model correlation. The statistical population of the research consists of all married female nurses of hospitals and government treatment centers in Alborz province in 1401, who were selected by a multi-stage cluster sampling method of 400 people from different treatment units and departments. In this research, the Conner and Davidson resilience questionnaire (2003), Dennis and Vanderwaal cognitive flexibility scale (2001), and Bagaroozi marital intimacy scale (2001) were used to analyze data from Amos version 24 software.
Results: For cognitive flexibility leading to marital intimacy, the value was 2.023. The value for the path of mental flexibility to resilience was 0.986, and for marital intimacy to resilience, it was 0.909. The critical ratio between cognitive flexibility (r= 0.767) and marital intimacy
(r = 0.796) had a positive and significant relationship with resilience at a significance level
of 0.01.
Conclusions: The results showed that the data fit the conceptual model of the research. Also, the mediating role of marital intimacy between cognitive flexibility and resilience was confirmed. According to the results obtained, to increase the resilience of married female nurses, it is suggested to health officials to Different cognitive, emotional and emotional variables of this group should be given special attention.
References
1. Beckman CM, Stanko TL. It takes three: Relational boundary work, resilience, and commitment among navy couples. Academy of Management Journal. 2020;63(2):411-439. doi: 10.5465/amj.2017.0653
2. Tahir K, Khan N. Mediating role of body image between sexual functioning and marital intimacy in Pakistani women with breast cancer. Psycho‐Oncology. 2021;30(2):260-6. doi: 10.1002/pon.5563
3. Miller K, Kelly A. Is self-compassion contagious? An examination of whether hearing a display of self-compassion impacts self-compassion in the listener. Can J Behav Sci. 2020;52(2):159-70. doi: 10.1037/cbs0000150
4. Du W, Luo M, Zhou Z. A study on the relationship between marital socioeconomic status, marital satisfaction, and depression: analysis based on Actor–Partner Interdependence Model (APIM). Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2022;17(3):1477-99. doi: 10.1007/s11482-021-09975-x
5. Fahimdanesh F, Noferesti A, Tavakol K. Self-compassion and forgiveness: Major predictors of marital satisfaction in young couples. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 2020;48(3):221-34. doi: 10.1080/01926187.2019.1708832
6. Frye N, Ganong L, Jensen T, Coleman M. A dyadic analysis of emotion regulation as a moderator of associations between marital conflict and marital satisfaction among first-married and remarried couples. Journal of Family Issues. 2020;41(12):2328-55. doi: 10.1177x20935504
7. Abe S, Oshio A. Does Marital Duration Moderate (Dis)Similarity Effects of Personality on Marital Satisfaction? SAGE Open. 2018;8(2). doi: 10.1177/2158244018784985
8. Basharat MA. The relationship between fear of intimacy and marital satisfaction in a sample of Iranian couples: the moderating role of attachment styles [in Persian]. Biannual Journal of Applied. 2012;2(1):1-18 doi: 10.1080/01926187.2019.1679052
9. Bahrai Z, Hosseinialmadani SA, Baseri A. The mediating role of resilience in the relationship between marital happiness, basic psychological needs and spirituality with family resilience [in Persian]. Journal of Applied Family Therapy. 2021;2(2)124-44. doi: 10.22034/aftj.2021.290783.1118
10. Burton NW, Pakenham KI, Brown WJ. Feasibility and effectiveness of psychosocial resilience training: A pilot study of the READY program. Psychol Health Med. 2010;15(3):266-77. pmid: 20480432 doi: 10.1080/13548501003758710
11. Odinka JI, Nwoke M, Chika Chukwuorji JB, Egbuagu K, Mefoh P, Chidi Ndukuba A, et al. Dependent Personality, Mindful Awareness, and Marital Satisfaction and their Association with Postpartum Psychological Distress in Two Tertiary Hospitals, Southeast Nigeria. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2020;31(2):920-38. pmid: 33410816 doi: 10.1353/hpu.2020.0069
12. Riahi F, Golzari M, Mootabi F. The relationship between emotion regulation and marital satisfaction using the actor-partner interdependence model. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2020;26(1):44-63. doi: 10.32598/ijpcp.26.1.3038.1
13. Vazquez V, Otero I, Goodlow J. Relationship stigma and Black-White interracial marital satisfaction: the mediating role of religious/spiritual well-being. Mental Health Religion & Culture. 2019;22(3):305-18. doi: 10.1080/13674676.2019.1620189
14. Domaradzka E, Fajkowska M. Cognitive emotion regulation strategies in anxiety and depression understood as types of personality. Front Psychol. 2018;9:856. pmid: 29946277 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00856
15. Martin RC, Dahlen ER. Cognitive emotion regulation in the prediction of depression, anxiety, stress, and anger. Pers Individ. 2005;39(7):1249-60. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.004
16. Peixoto-Freitas J, Rodríguez-González M, Crabtree SA, Martins MV. Differentiation of self, couple adjustment and family life cycle: a cross-sectional study. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 48(4):299–316. doi: 10.1080/01926187.2020.1736689
17. Bartle‐Haring S, Ferriby M, Day R. Couple differentiation: Mediator or Moderator of depressive symptoms and relationship satisfaction? J Marital Fam Ther. 2019;45(4):563-77. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12326
18. Viet Bui M, McInnes E, Ennis G, Foster K. Protocol for a mixed methods process evaluationof the Promoting Resilience in Nurses (PRiN). Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022;31(3):687–96. doi: 10.1111/inm.12989
19. Işık E, Özbiler Ş, Schweer-Collins ML, Rodríguez-González M. Differentiation of self predicts life satisfaction through marital adjustment. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 2020;48(3):235-49. doi: 10.1080/01926187.2020.1732248
20. Lampis J, Cataudella S. Adult attachment and differentiation of self-constructs: a possible dialogue? Contemporary Family Therapy. 2019;41(3):227-35. doi: 10.1007/s10591-019-09489-7
21. İkican TÇ, Coşansu G, Erdoğan G, Küçük L, Bilim İÖ. The relationship of marital adjustment and sexual satisfaction with depressive symptoms in women. Sex Disabil. 2020;38:247–60. doi: 10.1007/s11195-019-09590-7
22. Masten AS, Lucke CM, Nelson KM, Stallworthy IC. Resilience in Development and Psychopathology: Multisystem Perspectives. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021:17:521-49. pmid: 33534615 doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-120307
23. Noori J, Nejat H, Nameni E, Fariborzi E. Comparison of the effectiveness of the treatment of a monotheistic integrated and the objective relationship on self-differentiation and marital intimacy. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 2019;48(1): 70-86. doi: 10.1080/01926187.2019.1679052
24. .Peleg O, Messerschmidt‐Grandi C. Differentiation of self and trait anxiety: A cross‐cultural perspective. Int J Psychol. 2019;54(6):816-27. pmid: 30289168 doi: 10.1002/ijop.12535
25. .Robins NA. Of Love and Loathing: Marital Life, Strife, and Intimacy in the Colonial Andes, 1750–1825. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press; 2021. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt1d9nhx8
26. Planalp EM, van Hulle CA, Goldsmith HH. Parenting in context: Marital adjustment, parent affect, and child temperament in
27. complex families. J Fam Psychol. 2019;33(5):532-41. pmid: 30730182 doi: 10.1037/fam0000511
28. Rikhye RV, Gilra A, Halassa MM. Thalamic regulation of switching between cortical representations enables cognitive flexibility. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(12):1753-63. pmid: 30455456 doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0269-z
29. Toraman Ç, Özdemir HF, Kosan AMA, Orakci S. Relationships between cognitive flexibility, perceived quality of faculty life, learning approaches, and academic achievement. International Journal of Instruction. 2020;13(1):85-100. doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.1316a
30. Ünal Ö, Akgün S. Conflict resolution styles as predictors of marital adjustment and marital satisfaction: an actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Studies. Journal of Family Studies. 2020;28(3):898–913. doi: 10.1080/13229400.2020.1766542
31. Whisman MA, du Pont A, Rhee SH, Spotts EL, Lichtenstein P, Ganiban JM, et al. A genetically informative analysis of the association between dyadic adjustment, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms. J Affect Disord. 237:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.105
32. .Wilson AC, MackintoshK, Power K, ChanSW. Effectiveness of self-compassion related therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mindfulness. 2019;10(6):979-95. doi: 10.1007/s12671-018-1037-6
33. Yu Y, Yu Y, Lin Y. Anxiety and depression aggravate impulsiveness: the mediating and moderating role of cognitive flexibility. Psychol Health Med. 2020;25(1):25-36. pmid: 30947527 doi: 10.1080/13548506.2019.1601748
34. Zmigrod L, Rentfrow PJ, Zmigrod S, Robbins TW. Cognitive flexibility and religious disbelief. Psychol Res. 2019;83(8):1749-59. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1034-3
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
